Decision Making
Decision Making in Hypothesis Testing
Purpose and Rationale
Core Purpose
The decision-making approach in hypothesis testing serves several essential purposes:
-
Formal Decision Framework
- Provides a structured procedure for choosing between competing hypotheses
- Establishes clear rules for making statistical decisions
- Enables consistent interpretation of results across studies
-
Error Control
- Helps manage the risk of incorrect decisions
- Provides a framework for controlling Type I errors
- Enables planning for appropriate sample sizes
-
Practical Applications
- Supports decision-making in research and business
- Guides policy and intervention decisions
- Helps in quality control and process improvement
The Rationale Behind Decision Making
-
Why We Need Formal Decisions
- Research and business often require clear yes/no decisions
- Need to balance evidence with practical constraints
- Provides a framework for action when evidence is sufficient
-
Why Use Significance Levels
- Controls the rate of false positive errors
- Provides a standardized approach to decision making
- Enables comparison across different studies
-
Why Consider Both Types of Errors
- Type I errors (false positives) can lead to unnecessary actions
- Type II errors (false negatives) can miss important effects
- Need to balance both types of errors based on context
The Decision Making Process
Setting the Significance Level (α)
Aspect | Description | Considerations |
---|---|---|
Definition | Pre-determined threshold for p-value | Usually 0.05 or 0.01 |
Purpose | Controls Type I error rate | Should be context-dependent |
Common Values | 0.05, 0.01, 0.10 | Consider consequences of errors |
Step-by-Step Process
-
Pre-Analysis Steps
- Set significance level (α)
- Define null and alternative hypotheses
- Determine required sample size
- Plan analysis approach
-
Data Collection and Analysis
- Gather random sample
- Check necessary conditions
- Calculate test statistic
- Determine p-value
-
Decision Making
- Compare p-value to α
- Make decision (reject/fail to reject H₀)
- Consider practical significance
- State conclusion in context
Decision Rules
Condition | Decision | Interpretation |
---|---|---|
p-value ≤ α | Reject H₀ | Sufficient evidence against H₀ |
p-value > α | Fail to reject H₀ | Insufficient evidence against H₀ |
Types of Errors
Error Types and Consequences
Error Type | Definition | Probability | Consequences |
---|---|---|---|
Type I (α) | Reject true H₀ | α | False positive, unnecessary action |
Type II (β) | Fail to reject false H₀ | β | False negative, missed opportunity |
Error Control
Aspect | Description | How to Control |
---|---|---|
Type I Error | False positive rate | Set α level |
Type II Error | False negative rate | Increase sample size |
Power | 1 - β | Plan sample size |
Important Considerations
Statistical vs. Practical Significance
Aspect | Statistical | Practical |
---|---|---|
Focus | P-value and α | Effect size and context |
Question | Is there an effect? | Is the effect important? |
Dependence | Sample size | Real-world impact |
Common Issues and Solutions
Issue | Problem | Solution |
---|---|---|
Arbitrary α | Rigid cutoff may not fit context | Adjust based on consequences |
Multiple Testing | Increased Type I error | Adjust α or use corrections |
P-hacking | Data manipulation for significance | Pre-specify analyses |
Publication Bias | Only significant results published | Report all studies |
Best Practices
-
Before Analysis
- Pre-specify hypotheses and analyses
- Choose appropriate α level
- Plan sample size for desired power
- Consider practical significance
-
During Analysis
- Check all assumptions
- Calculate effect size
- Consider confidence intervals
- Document all decisions
-
After Analysis
- Report exact p-values
- Include effect sizes
- Discuss practical significance
- Consider limitations
Alternative Approaches
Strength of Evidence Approach
Aspect | Description | Advantages |
---|---|---|
Focus | P-value interpretation | More nuanced understanding |
Decision | Based on evidence strength | Less arbitrary |
Reporting | Exact p-values | More informative |
Complementary Methods
Method | Purpose | When to Use |
---|---|---|
Confidence Intervals | Estimate precision | Always report |
Effect Size | Measure importance | Always calculate |
Power Analysis | Plan sample size | Before study |
Related Topics
- Hypothesis Testing Basics - Foundation for decision making
- Type I and Type II Errors - Understanding potential mistakes
- Statistical Significance - Understanding what makes results significant
- Effect Size - Measuring practical importance
- Confidence Interval - Alternative approach to inference
- Power Analysis - Planning for adequate sample size
- Multiple Comparisons - Handling multiple tests
- P-hacking - Understanding and avoiding data manipulation